🔬 Science · Scientific Reasoning · Lesson 5 of 6 · 5 min
Logic and evidence: correlation vs causation, observation vs inference
🧠 Two things happening together does not mean one causes the other. TEAS items test whether you can spot that leap.
💡 Key idea
Correlation shows variables move together; only a controlled experiment can show one causes the other.
🧠 The idea
An OBSERVATION is information gathered directly with the senses or instruments ("the solution turned blue"). An INFERENCE is a conclusion or interpretation based on observations ("a chemical reaction occurred"). Observations can be QUALITATIVE (descriptions: color, smell, texture) or QUANTITATIVE (numbers with units: 25 mL, 37 °C). A CORRELATION means two variables change together; it can be positive (both rise) or negative (one rises as the other falls). CAUSATION means one variable actually produces a change in the other. Correlation alone does not prove causation, because a third factor may drive both, the direction may be reversed, or the link may be coincidence. Ice cream sales and sunburns both rise in summer because of a third factor: sunny, hot weather. A controlled experiment that changes only one variable is the best evidence for cause and effect. Strong evidence is measurable, repeatable and comes from adequate samples.
✏️ Worked example
A survey finds that people who carry lighters have higher rates of lung disease. Does carrying a lighter cause lung disease? Ask three questions. Third factor? Yes: smoking explains both carrying a lighter and lung disease. Reversed direction? No. Coincidence? Unlikely with a large sample. Conclusion: the data show a correlation, and the likely cause is a third variable, smoking. To test causation you would need a controlled experiment, which here would be unethical, so researchers use careful study designs that account for smoking.
📌 Takeaways
- Observation = what you sense or measure; inference = what you conclude from it.
- Qualitative = descriptions; quantitative = numbers with units.
- Correlation is not causation: look for a third factor or reversed direction.
📖 Terms in this lesson
Correlation vs causation: Two things rising or falling together (correlation) does not prove that one causes the other (causation); for example, ice cream sales and sunburns both rise in summer, but neither causes the other.
✅ Check yourself
Question 1 of 3
Which statement is an inference rather than an observation?
- The leaf is sick from a fungus.
- The leaf feels dry and brittle.
- The leaf has brown spots.
- The leaf is 6 cm long.
Show the answer and rationale
Answer: A
Saying the leaf is sick from a fungus is an explanation drawn from what was seen, so it is an inference. Length, brown spots and a dry feel are all gathered directly by measuring, looking or touching.
Question 2 of 3
A town finds that months with more umbrella sales also have more car accidents. What is the most likely explanation?
- Umbrellas cause drivers to crash.
- Car accidents cause people to buy umbrellas.
- Rainy weather increases both.
- The two numbers are not related at all.
Show the answer and rationale
Answer: C
Rain is a third factor that raises both umbrella sales and accidents (wet roads, poor visibility). The data show a real correlation, so "not related" is wrong, and neither variable directly causes the other.
Question 3 of 3
Which observation is quantitative?
- The water is cloudy.
- The water's temperature is 18 °C.
- The water is light green.
- The water smells like sulfur.
Show the answer and rationale
Answer: B
Quantitative observations are numbers with units, such as 18 °C. Cloudy, sulfur smell and light green are descriptions of qualities, so they are qualitative.
The full lesson with XP and a streak in the app. No account needed.
More in Scientific Reasoning
- 1The scientific method: steps, hypotheses, theories and laws
- 2Variables, controls and hypotheses: designing a fair test
- 3Measurement tools, metric units and precision
- 4Reading data from an investigation: trends and supported conclusions
- 5Logic and evidence: correlation vs causation, observation vs inference
- 6Predicting relationships: direct, inverse and food-web effects